首页> 外文OA文献 >High-resolution multi-sensor geophysical surveys for near-surface applications can be rapid and cost-effective
【2h】

High-resolution multi-sensor geophysical surveys for near-surface applications can be rapid and cost-effective

机译:适用于近地表应用的高分辨率多传感器地球物理勘测可以快速且经济高效地进行

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Too often geophysical surveys of the near surface are a last resort. Direct sampling by trenching or trial pits is relatively cheap and gives a geologist or engineer a direct view of the target. Boreholes are a natural extension from trial pits since, although they sample in depth at only one point, they may recover physical samples of the material from the units under investigation. Geophysics is frequently regarded as useful in terms of being noninvasive, but lacking in resolution, and incapable of coping with complex near-surface materials. This presents a strange contradiction, since geophysical surveys are accepted as a good tool for archaeological surveys, where the main purpose is to identify inhomogeneity in the near surface with high resolution. Archaeogeophysical surveys are highly detailed, but slow and expensive. Running surveys of the same area with multiple geophysical methods is even more expensive, though this offers the prospect of improved characterization of subsurface materials.
机译:经常地,对近地表进行地球物理调查是不得已的选择。通过挖坑或试验坑进行直接采样相对便宜,并且可以让地质学家或工程师直接查看目标。钻孔是试验坑的自然延伸,因为尽管它们仅在一个点上进行深度采样,但它们仍可以从所研究的设备中回收材料的物理样本。地球物理学通常被认为具有无创性,但缺乏分辨率以及无法应对复杂的近地表材料的作用。这是一个奇怪的矛盾,因为地球物理勘测被认为是考古勘测的良好工具,其主要目的是以高分辨率识别近地表中的不均匀性。考古地球物理调查非常详细,但速度缓慢且昂贵。使用多种地球物理方法对同一地区进行勘测甚至更加昂贵,尽管这提供了改善地下材料表征的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号